Summary:
**Context:**
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9748 added support to charge table reader memory to block cache. In the test `ChargeTableReaderTest/ChargeTableReaderTest.Basic`, it estimated the table reader memory, calculated the expected number of table reader opened based on this estimation and asserted this number with actual number. The expected number of table reader opened calculated based on estimated table reader memory will not be 100% accurate and should have tolerance for error. It was previously set to 1% and recently encountered an assertion failure that `(opened_table_reader_num) <= (max_table_reader_num_capped_upper_bound), actual: 375 or 376 vs 374` where `opened_table_reader_num` is the actual opened one and `max_table_reader_num_capped_upper_bound` is the estimated opened one (=371 * 1.01). I believe it's safe to increase error tolerance from 1% to 5% hence there is this PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10113
Test Plan: - CI again succeeds.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision:
D36911556
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id:
259687dd77b450fea0f5658a5b567a1d31d4b1f7
// 2. overestimate/underestimate max_table_reader_num_capped due to the gap
// between ApproximateTableReaderMem() and actual table reader mem
std::size_t max_table_reader_num_capped_upper_bound =
- (std::size_t)(max_table_reader_num_capped * 1.01);
+ (std::size_t)(max_table_reader_num_capped * 1.05);
std::size_t max_table_reader_num_capped_lower_bound =
- (std::size_t)(max_table_reader_num_capped * 0.99);
+ (std::size_t)(max_table_reader_num_capped * 0.95);
std::size_t max_table_reader_num_uncapped =
(std::size_t)(max_table_reader_num_capped * 1.1);
ASSERT_GT(max_table_reader_num_uncapped,