test/allocator_test: additional coverage for get_fragmentation_score

Tests the function results agains the same cases as we do for
get_fragmentation.

Signed-off-by: Igor Fedotov <ifedotov@suse.com>

diff --git a/src/test/objectstore/Allocator_test.cc b/src/test/objectstore/Allocator_test.cc
index 34d1489a02e7dfd8dc197bc70d88bc18f8fd103e..06285a971f0cfa926e21e6d42c9430dc01456749 100644 (file)
--- a/src/test/objectstore/Allocator_test.cc
+++ b/src/test/objectstore/Allocator_test.cc
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ TEST_P(AllocTest, test_alloc_fragmentation)
     alloc->release(release_set);
   }
   EXPECT_EQ(1.0, alloc->get_fragmentation(alloc_unit));
+  EXPECT_EQ(66u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation_score() * 100));
+
   for (size_t i = 1; i < allocated.size() / 2; i += 2)
   {
     interval_set<uint64_t> release_set;
@@ -280,6 +282,7 @@ TEST_P(AllocTest, test_alloc_fragmentation)
     // fragmentation approx = 257 intervals / 768 max intervals
     EXPECT_EQ(33u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation(alloc_unit) * 100));
   }
+  EXPECT_EQ(27u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation_score() * 100));
 
   for (size_t i = allocated.size() / 2 + 1; i < allocated.size(); i += 2)
   {
@@ -292,6 +295,11 @@ TEST_P(AllocTest, test_alloc_fragmentation)
   // Hence leaving just two 
   // digits after decimal point due to this.
   EXPECT_EQ(0u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation(alloc_unit) * 100));
+  if (bitmap_alloc) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(0u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation_score() * 100));
+  } else {
+    EXPECT_EQ(11u, uint64_t(alloc->get_fragmentation_score() * 100));
+  }
 }
 
 TEST_P(AllocTest, test_dump_fragmentation_score)
@@ -309,6 +317,7 @@ TEST_P(AllocTest, test_dump_fragmentation_score)
   alloc->init_add_free(0, capacity);
 
   EXPECT_EQ(0.0, alloc->get_fragmentation(alloc_unit));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0.0, alloc->get_fragmentation_score());
 
   uint64_t allocated_cnt = 0;
   for (size_t round = 0; round < rounds ; round++) {