--- /dev/null
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2025 Chao Yu. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test No. f2fs/013
+#
+# This is a regression testcase to check whether we will handle database
+# inode dirty status correctly:
+# 1. mount f2fs image w/ timeout fault injection option
+# 2. create a regular file, and write data into the file
+# 3. start transaction on the file (via F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
+# 4. write transaction data to the file
+# 5. commit and end the transaction (via F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
+# 6. meanwhile loop call fsync in parallel
+# Before f098aeba04c9 ("f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic
+# file"), database file may become corrupted after atomic write while
+# there is concurrent dirty inode flush in background.
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto quick
+_require_kernel_config CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
+_require_command "$F2FS_IO_PROG" f2fs_io
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ [ -n "$atomic_write_pid" ] && kill -9 $atomic_write_pid
+ wait
+ cd /
+ rm -r -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+_fixed_by_kernel_commit f098aeba04c9 \
+ "f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic file"
+
+_require_scratch
+
+_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
+# note that it relies on FAULT_TIMEOUT fault injection support in f2fs
+_scratch_mount "-o fault_injection=1,fault_type=4194304" >> $seqres.full
+
+dbfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file.db
+
+# initialize database file
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c "fsync" -f $dbfile >> $seqres.full
+
+# sync filesystem to clear dirty inode
+sync
+
+# start atomic_write on src.db database file and commit transaction
+$F2FS_IO_PROG write 1 0 2 zero atomic_commit $dbfile >> $seqres.full &
+atomic_write_pid=$!
+
+# call fsync to flush dirty inode of database file in parallel
+for ((j=0;j<1000;j++)) do
+ $F2FS_IO_PROG fsync $dbfile >> $seqres.full
+done
+
+wait $atomic_write_pid
+unset atomic_write_pid
+
+# flush dirty data and drop cache
+sync
+echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
+
+stat $dbfile -c %s
+
+rm $dbfile
+sync
+
+status=0
+exit