Summary:
I have an application configured with 16 background threads. Write rates are high. L0->L1 compactions is very slow and it limits the concurrency of the system. While it's happening, other 15 threads are idle. However, when there is a need of a flush, that one thread busy with L0->L1 is doing flush, instead of any other 15 threads that are just sitting there.
This diff prevents that. If there are threads that are idle, we don't let flush preempt compaction.
Test Plan: Will run stress test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: sdong, yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22299
uint64_t DBImpl::CallFlushDuringCompaction(ColumnFamilyData* cfd,
DeletionState& deletion_state,
LogBuffer* log_buffer) {
+ if (options_.max_background_flushes > 0) {
+ // flush thread will take care of this
+ return 0;
+ }
if (cfd->imm()->imm_flush_needed.NoBarrier_Load() != nullptr) {
const uint64_t imm_start = env_->NowMicros();
mutex_.Lock();