From: Dan van der Ster Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 21:31:07 +0000 (-0700) Subject: doc: for EC we recommend K+1 X-Git-Tag: v19.0.0~756^2 X-Git-Url: http://git-server-git.apps.pok.os.sepia.ceph.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=68faf88e6babf7e5c2cce2b4d9b80a159b38c30d;p=ceph.git doc: for EC we recommend K+1 Update the doc to match the reality in the code. I don't know where the recommendation to have min_size = k+2 came from, but for awhile now we've defaulted to K+1. See PR #8008. Signed-off-by: Dan van der Ster --- diff --git a/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst b/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst index ccb2099394c5..e2bd3c296625 100644 --- a/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst +++ b/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ mode. As a result, however, pools with lost OSDs but without complete data loss unable to recover and go active without manual intervention to temporarily change the ``min_size`` setting. -We recommend that ``min_size`` be ``K+2`` or greater to prevent loss of writes and +We recommend that ``min_size`` be ``K+1`` or greater to prevent loss of writes and loss of data.