From: Eduardo Roldan Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:40:21 +0000 (-0300) Subject: doc:start.rst fix typo in hw-recs X-Git-Tag: v17.2.8~530^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.apps.os.sepia.ceph.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e7b4707359c099b76b9bd24073c37e786a08a04;p=ceph.git doc:start.rst fix typo in hw-recs s/power less/power loss/ Signed-off-by: Eduardo Roldan (cherry picked from commit b80c12d080275e3c221a1e305c345fbc1caa3c8e) --- diff --git a/doc/start/hardware-recommendations.rst b/doc/start/hardware-recommendations.rst index 745afa9d6b0c3..6884ad04453c3 100644 --- a/doc/start/hardware-recommendations.rst +++ b/doc/start/hardware-recommendations.rst @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ once a limited cache is filled declines considerably. Consider also durability: a drive rated for 0.3 Drive Writes Per Day (DWPD or equivalent) may be fine for OSDs dedicated to certain types of sequentially-written read-mostly data, but are not a good choice for Ceph Monitor duty. Enterprise-class SSDs are best -for Ceph: they almost always feature power less protection (PLP) and do +for Ceph: they almost always feature power loss protection (PLP) and do not suffer the dramatic cliffing that client (desktop) models may experience. When using a single (or mirrored pair) SSD for both operating system boot