From: Nathan Cutler Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:12:19 +0000 (+0200) Subject: doc: remove btrfs contradiction X-Git-Tag: v11.0.1~330^2 X-Git-Url: http://git-server-git.apps.pok.os.sepia.ceph.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=efc235895d862ef664188583bb77d0a3f8db5baa;p=ceph.git doc: remove btrfs contradiction btrfs is not "the ideal choice for Ceph clusters" because it isn't mature and the promised features (like deduplication) have not materialized. The "Filesystems -> Recommended" section of this very same document (several paragraphs) above the paragraph being modified by this commit, has been modified to say "We used to recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. . . . However . . . ." This PR removes this contradiction. Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler --- diff --git a/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst b/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst index e0d558a37a07..6225dd379ad5 100644 --- a/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst +++ b/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst @@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ capability means that ``btrfs`` can support snapshots that are writable. ``btrfs`` also incorporates multi-device management into the file system, which enables you to support heterogeneous disk storage infrastructure, data allocation policies. The community also aims to provide ``fsck``, -deduplication, and data encryption support in the future. This compelling -list of features makes ``btrfs`` the ideal choice for Ceph clusters. +deduplication, and data encryption support in the future. .. _copy-on-write: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy-on-write .. _compared: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems