xfs_rename can update up to 5 inodes: src_dp, target_dp, src_ip, target_ip
and wip. So we need to increase the inode reservation to match.
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
For leaf dir, In most cases, there should be as many bestfree slots
as the dir data blocks that can fit under i_size (except for [1]).
Root cause is we don't examin the number bestfree slots, when the slots
number less than dir data blocks, if we need to allocate new dir data
block and update the bestfree array, we will use the dir block number as
index to assign bestfree array, while we did not check the leaf buf
boundary which may cause UAF or other memory access problem. This issue
can also triggered with test cases xfs/473 from fstests.
According to Dave Chinner & Darrick's suggestion, adding buffer verifier
to detect this abnormal situation in time.
Simplify the testcase for fstest xfs/554 [1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220928095355.2074025-1-guoxuenan@huawei.com/ Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
get_random_u32() for several releases now, and compiles down to the
exact same code. Replace the deprecated wrapper with a direct call to
the real function. The same also applies to get_random_int(), which is
just a wrapper around get_random_u32(). This was done as a basic find
and replace.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> # for ext4 Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> # for sch_cake Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> # for nfsd Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # for thunderbolt Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # for parisc Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> # for s390 Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Rather than incurring a division or requesting too many random bytes for
the given range, use the prandom_u32_max() function, which only takes
the minimum required bytes from the RNG and avoids divisions. This was
done mechanically with this coccinelle script:
// Find a potential literal
@literal_mask@
expression LITERAL;
type T;
identifier get_random_u32 =~ "get_random_int|prandom_u32|get_random_u32";
position p;
@@
((T)get_random_u32()@p & (LITERAL))
// Add one to the literal.
@script:python add_one@
literal << literal_mask.LITERAL;
RESULT;
@@
value = None
if literal.startswith('0x'):
value = int(literal, 16)
elif literal[0] in '123456789':
value = int(literal, 10)
if value is None:
print("I don't know how to handle %s" % (literal))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif value == 2**32 - 1 or value == 2**31 - 1 or value == 2**24 - 1 or value == 2**16 - 1 or value == 2**8 - 1:
print("Skipping 0x%x for cleanup elsewhere" % (value))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif value & (value + 1) != 0:
print("Skipping 0x%x because it's not a power of two minus one" % (value))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif literal.startswith('0x'):
coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("0x%x" % (value + 1))
else:
coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("%d" % (value + 1))
// Replace the literal mask with the calculated result.
@plus_one@
expression literal_mask.LITERAL;
position literal_mask.p;
expression add_one.RESULT;
identifier FUNC;
@@
@collapse_ret@
type T;
identifier VAR;
expression E;
@@
{
- T VAR;
- VAR = (E);
- return VAR;
+ return E;
}
@drop_var@
type T;
identifier VAR;
@@
{
- T VAR;
... when != VAR
}
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> # for ext4 and sbitmap Reviewed-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> # for drbd Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> # for s390 Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # for mmc Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
xfs_dir2_isleaf is used to see if the directory is a single-leaf
form directory instead, as commented right above the function.
Besides getting rid of the broken comment, we rearrange the logic by
converting everything over to standard formatting and conventions,
at the same time, to make it easier to understand and self documenting.
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Take a look at the for-loop in xfs_da_grow_inode_int:
======
for(){
nmap = min(XFS_BMAP_MAX_NMAP, count);
...
error = xfs_bmapi_write(...,&mapp[mapi], &nmap);//(..., $1, $2)
...
mapi += nmap;
}
=====
where $1 stands for the start address of the array,
while $2 is used to indicate the size of the array.
The array $1 will advance by $nmap in each iteration after
the allocation of extents.
But the size $2 still remains unchanged, which is determined by
min(XFS_BMAP_MAX_NMAP, count).
It seems that it has forgotten to trim the mapp array after each
iteration, so change it.
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Return the value xfs_dir_cilookup_result() directly instead of storing it
in another redundant variable.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
The "%Ld" specifier, which represents long long unsigned,
doesn't meet C language standard, and even more,
it makes people easily mistake with "%ld", which represent
long unsigned. So replace "%Ld" with "lld".
Do the same with "%Lu".
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>