From 155cf517b0cfc3bfe27e476dfa290f4780c3da21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Sandeen Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:06:23 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] xfs/068: fix expected output file for proper restore output Oh my, I did a very bad thing - I wrote a new test to check for xfsdump regressions, but did not create the .out file with a known-good kernel. This matches output from older, stable kernels, and is the proper expected output. Sorry about that! Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- tests/xfs/068.out | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/xfs/068.out b/tests/xfs/068.out index c270c661..2196eeec 100644 --- a/tests/xfs/068.out +++ b/tests/xfs/068.out @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ xfsrestore: session id: ID xfsrestore: media ID: ID xfsrestore: searching media for directory dump xfsrestore: reading directories -xfsrestore: 486 directories and 1590 entries processed +xfsrestore: 495 directories and 1593 entries processed xfsrestore: directory post-processing xfsrestore: restoring non-directory files xfsrestore: restore complete: SECS seconds elapsed -- 2.39.5