From 42072d46da27ce7944bd823f944583911a32bedd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ville Ojamo <14869000+bluikko@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 15:26:56 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] doc/rados/operations: Fix unordered list in health-checks.rst Fix missing empty line before an unordered list that caused it to be rendered wrong. Also, the sentences in each list item start with a capital case letter so add the missing full stop at the end. Signed-off-by: Ville Ojamo <14869000+bluikko@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 0dc5f4632cb3a83cfdd9985cadb9ae953949a5b8) --- doc/rados/operations/health-checks.rst | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/rados/operations/health-checks.rst b/doc/rados/operations/health-checks.rst index 5bd0ca070bf36..7231d9c1a35cb 100644 --- a/doc/rados/operations/health-checks.rst +++ b/doc/rados/operations/health-checks.rst @@ -164,10 +164,11 @@ the cluster is provisioned with at least three Ceph Monitors and are using the ``connectivity`` election strategy. Network partitions are reported in two ways: + - As location-level netsplits (e.g., "Netsplit detected between dc1 and dc2") when - all monitors in one location cannot communicate with all monitors in another location + all monitors in one location cannot communicate with all monitors in another location. - As individual monitor netsplits (e.g., "Netsplit detected between mon.a and mon.d") - when only specific monitors are disconnected across locations + when only specific monitors are disconnected across locations. The system prioritizes reporting at the highest topology level (``datacenter``, ``rack``, etc.) when possible, to better help operators identify infrastructure-level network issues. -- 2.39.5