From 5249e5fe031a532c530f815b1a8c27a9a49687f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kefu Chai Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:58:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study: fix a typo Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai --- doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study.rst b/doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study.rst index 694cb379b81..eb2cfe35501 100644 --- a/doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study.rst +++ b/doc/dev/osd_internals/mclock_wpq_cmp_study.rst @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ objects to be recovered in all the cases using HDDs with WAL and dB was around .. image:: ../../images/mclock_wpq_study/Recovery_Rate_Comparison_HDD_WALdB_WPQ_vs_mClock.png -As expected, the *high_client_ops* impacts recovery opeations the most as it +As expected, the *high_client_ops* impacts recovery operations the most as it took an average of ~1409 secs for the recovery to complete at ~3 Objects/sec. The recovery bandwidth as expected was the lowest at ~11 MiB/s. -- 2.39.5