From 9c919f9dda287e57d92f42e735521eaf32bb6df5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan van der Ster Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 14:31:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] doc: for EC we recommend K+1 Update the doc to match the reality in the code. I don't know where the recommendation to have min_size = k+2 came from, but for awhile now we've defaulted to K+1. See PR #8008. Signed-off-by: Dan van der Ster (cherry picked from commit 68faf88e6babf7e5c2cce2b4d9b80a159b38c30d) --- doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst b/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst index ccb2099394c..e2bd3c29662 100644 --- a/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst +++ b/doc/rados/operations/erasure-code.rst @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ mode. As a result, however, pools with lost OSDs but without complete data loss unable to recover and go active without manual intervention to temporarily change the ``min_size`` setting. -We recommend that ``min_size`` be ``K+2`` or greater to prevent loss of writes and +We recommend that ``min_size`` be ``K+1`` or greater to prevent loss of writes and loss of data. -- 2.39.5