#! /bin/bash # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 # Copyright (C) 2017 Synology Inc. All Rights Reserved. # # FS QA Test No. btrfs/135 # # Test that an incremental send operation works when in both snapshots there are # two directory inodes that have the same number but different generations and # have an entry with the same name that corresponds to different inodes in each # snapshot. # seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { cd / rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _require_test _require_scratch _require_fssum send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount touch $SCRATCH_MNT/f mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/d1 mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/d259_old mv $SCRATCH_MNT/d1 $SCRATCH_MNT/d259_old/d1 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |--- f (ino 257) # | # |--- d259_old/ (ino 259) # |--- d1/ (ino 258) # $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 > /dev/null $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $send_files_dir/1.snap \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>&1 1>/dev/null | _filter_scratch _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/d1 mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/dir258 mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/dir259 mv $SCRATCH_MNT/d1 $SCRATCH_MNT/dir259/d1 # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |--- dir258/ (ino 258) # | # |--- dir259/ (ino 259) # |--- d1/ (ino 257) # # Notice that at this point all inodes have a generation with value 7, which is # the generation value for a brand new filesystem. # Now create the second snapshot. This makes the filesystem's current generation # value to increase to the value 8, due to a transaction commit performed by the # snapshot creation ioctl. $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 > /dev/null # Now receive the first snapshot created in the first filesystem. # Before creating any inodes, the receive command creates the first snapshot, # which causes a transaction commit and therefore bumps the filesystem's current # generation to the value 9. All the inodes created end up getting a generation # value of 9 and the snapshot's root inode (256) gets a generation value of 8. $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/1.snap $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null rm $send_files_dir/1.snap $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $send_files_dir/1.snap \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>&1 1>/dev/null | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/2.snap \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>&1 1>/dev/null | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify we get # the same content that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/1.snap $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 # The receive of the incremental send stream used to fail because it contained # a rmdir operation with an invalid path. The output of the receive command, # with verbose mode (argument -vv), was the following: # # utimes # unlink f # mkdir o257-7-0 # mkdir o259-7-0 # rename o257-7-0 -> o259-7-0/d1 # chown o259-7-0/d1 - uid=0, gid=0 # chmod o259-7-0/d1 - mode=0755 # utimes o259-7-0/d1 # rmdir o258-9-0 # ERROR: rmdir o258-9-0 failed: No such file or directory # # When the kernel was computing the send stream and processing inode 258, it # noticed that in both snapshots this inode is a direct child of inode 259, and # that in both snapshots inode 259 as an entry with the name "d1". Because of # that it decided (incorrectly) to issue an rmdir operation using the orphanized # name of the inode 258 from the parent snapshot (which has a generation of 9). # However that decision to send an rmdir operation due to the dentry collision # was incorrect because the inodes with number 259 in both snapshots are not the # same, they have different generations. # $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/2.snap $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 status=0 exit