The tests covers 100% of the LOC of proc_replica_log. It is broken down
in 7 cases to enumerate all the situations it must address. Each case
is isolated in a independant code block where the conditions are
reproduced.
All tests are done on omissing and oinfo because they are the only
data structures that can be modified by proc_replica_log.
The first case is a noop and checks that only last_complete gets
updated when there are no logs.
The following case includes entries that are supposed to be ignored (
x7, x8 and xa ), however this is not an actual proof that the code
ignoring them is actually run : it only shows in the code coverage
report.
The log entry (1,3) modifies the object x9 but the olog entry
(2,3) deletes it : log is authoritative and the object is added
to missing. x7 is divergent and ignored. x8 has a more recent
version in the log and the olog entry is ignored. xa is past
last_backfill and ignored.
The other cases are a variation of the first case with minimal changes
to make them easier to understand and adapt. For instance most of them
start with a tail that is the same ( object with hash x5 and both at
version 1,1 ).