If the leader has and older lc than we do, and we are sharing states to
bring them up to date, we still want to also share our uncommitted value.
This particular case was broken by
b26b7f6e, which was only contemplating
the case where the leader was ahead of us or at the same point as us, but
not the case where the leader was behind. Note that the call to
share_state() a few lines up will bring them fully up to date, so
after they receive and store_state() for this message they will be at the
same lc as we are.
Fixes: #5750
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit
05b6c7e8645081f405c616735238ae89602d3cc6)
// do we have an accepted but uncommitted value?
// (it'll be at last_committed+1)
bufferlist bl;
- if (collect->last_committed == last_committed &&
+ if (collect->last_committed <= last_committed &&
get_store()->exists(get_name(), last_committed+1)) {
get_store()->get(get_name(), last_committed+1, bl);
assert(bl.length() > 0);