In erasure coding section under Architecture, there is a mention of k = 2 + M =1 for
number of data copies and redundancy copies respectively, which is a bit ambiguous.
The proposal is to change to k = 2, M = 1 as the + sign is not needed here.
Signed-off-by: Nag Pavan Chilakam <nagpavan.chilakam@gmail.com>
authoritative version of the placement group logs.
In the following diagram, an erasure coded placement group has been created with
-``K = 2 + M = 1`` and is supported by three OSDs, two for ``K`` and one for
+``K = 2, M = 1`` and is supported by three OSDs, two for ``K`` and one for
``M``. The acting set of the placement group is made of **OSD 1**, **OSD 2** and
**OSD 3**. An object has been encoded and stored in the OSDs : the chunk
``D1v1`` (i.e. Data chunk number 1, version 1) is on **OSD 1**, ``D2v1`` on