doc/dev: remove ancient filestore-filesystem-compat doc

This describes a problem we fixed years ago.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>

diff --git a/doc/dev/filestore-filesystem-compat.rst b/doc/dev/filestore-filesystem-compat.rst
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index fae3523..0000000
--- a/doc/dev/filestore-filesystem-compat.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-====================================
- Filestore filesystem compatilibity
-====================================
-
-http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131942130322957&w=2
-
-Although running on ext4, xfs, or whatever other non-btrfs you want mostly
-works, there are a few important remaining issues:
-
-OSD journal replay of non-idempotent transactions
-=================================================
-
-**Resolved** with full sync but not ideal.
-See http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/213
-
-On non-btrfs backends, the Ceph OSDs use a write-ahead journal. After
-restart, the OSD does not know exactly which transactions in the
-journal may have already been committed to disk, and may reapply a
-transaction again during replay. For most operations (write, delete,
-truncate) this is fine.
-
-Some operations, though, are non-idempotent. The simplest example is
-CLONE, which copies (efficiently, on btrfs) data from one object to
-another. If the source object is modified, the osd restarts, and then
-the clone is replayed, the target will get incorrect (newer) data. For
-example,
-
-- clone A -> B
-- modify A
-- <osd crash, replay from 1>
-
-B will get new instead of old contents.
-
-(This doesn't happen on btrfs because the snapshots allow us to replay
-from a known consistent point in time.)
-
-Possibilities:
-
-- full sync after any non-idempotent operation
-- re-evaluate the lower level interface based on needs from higher
-  levels, construct only safe operations, be very careful; brittle
-- use xattrs to add sequence numbers to objects:
-
-  - on non-btrfs, we set a xattr on every modified object with the
-    op_seq, the unique sequence number for the transaction.
-  - for any (potentially) non-idempotent operation, we fsync() before
-    continuing to the next transaction, to ensure that xattr hits disk.
-  - on replay, we skip a transaction if the xattr indicates we already
-    performed this transaction.
-
-  Because every 'transaction' only modifies on a single object (file),
-  this ought to work. It'll make things like clone slow, but let's
-  face it: they're already slow on non-btrfs file systems because they
-  actually copy the data (instead of duplicating the extent refs in
-  btrfs). And it should make the full ObjectStore interface safe,
-  without upper layers having to worry about the kinds and orders of
-  transactions they perform.