ClientRequest::PGPipeline &ClientRequest::pp(PG &pg)
{
- return pg.client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ return pg.request_pg_pipeline;
}
bool ClientRequest::same_session_and_pg(const ClientRequest& other_op) const
CommonPGPipeline& InternalClientRequest::pp()
{
- return pg->client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ return pg->request_pg_pipeline;
}
seastar::future<> InternalClientRequest::start()
ClientRequest::PGPipeline &LogMissingRequest::pp(PG &pg)
{
- return pg.client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ return pg.request_pg_pipeline;
}
seastar::future<> LogMissingRequest::with_pg(
ClientRequest::PGPipeline &LogMissingRequestReply::pp(PG &pg)
{
- return pg.client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ return pg.request_pg_pipeline;
}
seastar::future<> LogMissingRequestReply::with_pg(
ClientRequest::PGPipeline &RepRequest::pp(PG &pg)
{
- return pg.client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ return pg.request_pg_pipeline;
}
seastar::future<> RepRequest::with_pg(
using ec_profile_t = std::map<std::string,std::string>;
using cached_map_t = OSDMapService::cached_map_t;
- ClientRequest::PGPipeline client_request_pg_pipeline;
+ ClientRequest::PGPipeline request_pg_pipeline;
PGPeeringPipeline peering_request_pg_pipeline;
ClientRequest::Orderer client_request_orderer;
//
// The following line of code should be "assert(pending_txn.at_version == at_version)",
// as there can be only one transaction at any time in pending_trans due to
- // PG::client_request_pg_pipeline. But there's a high possibility that we will
+ // PG::request_pg_pipeline. But there's a high possibility that we will
// improve the parallelism here in the future, which means there may be multiple
// client requests in flight, so we loosed the restriction to as follows. Correct
// me if I'm wrong:-)